Understanding LSAT vs GRE to make the right choice for Graduate and Law School

Picking through the maze of standardized tests is an essential decision for students preparing for further education, particularly where legal and interdisciplinary paths cross. The discussion of LSAT vs GRE has expanded as schools have opened their admissions policies and allowed test-taking flexibility. Knowing the differences between these exams can help test-takers prepare for their preferred academic and career paths.

The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) has long been the standard-bearer. It is designed to measure skills crucial to success in law school, such as logical and analytical reasoning, and reading comprehension across multiple paragraphs. The test does not measure math or general knowledge, but rather how well candidates analyze arguments and draw conclusions from dense texts. The exam is still very over for those who are only going to apply for the Juris Doctor.

The GRE, on the other hand, caters to a significantly more extensive student population. It is used by thousands of graduate and business schools around the world and spans a wide range of academic disciplines. The GRE tests verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, and analytical writing. It appeals to students who want flexibility, such as those eyeing dual-degree programs or interdisciplinary tracks with law studies.

One key difference between the LSAT and the GRE is the specific skills each exam emphasizes. The LSAT is logic-heavy, as much of it comes down to pattern recognition and steering (or evaluating) an argument. It also has mathematical elements, so it's probably more appropriate for someone strong in numerical reasoning. One test may be a better fit for students given their academic history, which affects overall application strength.

The evolution of admissions trends has also reshaped the conversation around LSAT vs. GRE. Many law schools have begun accepting GRE scores to broaden the pool of applicants beyond those with undergraduate degrees in history or English. But certain schools will still highly covet, or favor, LSAT scores, especially when determining who gets offered scholarships. This makes it critical that applicants seek out each school's policies rather than assume a preconceived stance.

Preparation strategies for the LSAT and GRE also differ significantly, requiring tailored approaches that focus on the unique skills each exam assesses. LSAT study heavily revolves around solving drill logic games and reading and analyzing the reasoning sections; however, GRE study is more of a mix of math, grammar, and writing. Time, availability, and cost of the test may also be considered when making a decision.

In the end, the LSAT vs GRE battle, there is no right or wrong answer. Some applicants who are applying only to law school may want to spend their time preparing for the LSAT. Some who seek a wider variety of graduate opportunities or are still in doubt may feel that the GRE is strategically better. By considering individual strengths, career goals, and target schools, students can identify the test that best aligns with their academic background to gain a clear advantage in highly competitive schools.

Paul Thomas is the author of this article. For more details about LSAT test interface practice please visit our website: lsac.org.